Veteranclaims’s Blog

September 24, 2010

Veterans Treatment Court, San Diego

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — veteranclaims @ 3:09 pm

Veterans need and deserve such Courts, hopefully this addition will provide insights upon which other counties can draw in creation of their own Veteran Court system.

Full Article at: Details emerge on Veterans Treatment Court

By Rick Rogers – For The North County Times North County Times – Californian | Posted: Friday, September 24, 2010 12:00 am

“The Veterans Treatment Court will be open to both active-duty troops and former service members charged with crimes, according to emerging details of the first judicial venue of its kind in San Diego County.

Tentatively set to start in March with San Diego Superior Court Judge Roger Krauel at the helm, the court’s goal is to reintegrate those struggling with the psychological baggage of their military service back into society, instead of sending them to jail for their offenses.

It appears Krauel is the right person for the right job. A Vietnam combat veteran and former Army Green Beret and Ranger, Krauel served 35 years in uniform after being drafted in 1967. He spent most of his duty days as reserve officer, with significant time assigned to the counter-terrorism field.

Former Gov. Pete Wilson appointed Krauel, 66, to the bench in 1999. He has sat on a number of courts that should serve him well on the pending court.

“As a judge, I have presided over domestic violence court, drug court, homeless court, stand-down court and mental health court,” Krauel said. “In each of these focused courts, I gained experience with issues that will be addressed in VTC.”

“My military experience assists me in creating rapport with persons who have military ties and appear in court,” Krauel said.

In early October, Krauel and a legal team from San Diego County will travel to Buffalo, N.Y., to observe how the oldest veterans court in the country does business.

“Each court has its own culture, so a solution in one jurisdiction might not work in another,” Krauel said. “But sharing the different approaches will help San Diego fashion a program that will work for us.”

Buffalo Judge Robert Russell started the country’s first veterans court in January 2008. A hybrid of existing specialty courts —- such as domestic violence court, mental health court and drug court —- veterans court has been a success.

A story on the Buffalo court earlier this year found that of 120 veterans enrolled in that program, 90 percent successfully completed the program and the recidivism rate was zero.

Below are pertinent facts edited from an interview with the judge.

— A defendant will be assigned to the San Diego Veterans Treatment Court based on the mutual recommendation of the prosecutor and defense lawyer, and supporting information from the probation department and agencies providing assessment and treatment. In accordance with the protocols to be established, the judge will accept the placement of a defendant into the VTC.

— According to the Veterans Administration, San Diego County has the highest concentration in the nation of veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts who are seeking treatment. California is adopting a new law that expressly authorizes counties to create VTCs. San Diego is planning a pilot project … (that) will test the assumption that by consolidating the managing of criminal sanctions and treatment programs, the VTC will reduce criminal recidivism in defendants who are veterans who suffer a service-connected mental disorder.

— All of the programs of the San Diego Court are open to defendants who are on active duty, with accommodations considered concerning the demands of the military. The San Diego VTC will be similarly open. As to military charges, in certain circumstances military procedures allow for military sanctions to be imposed in addition to whatever a civilian court does. Where there is military jurisdiction over the crime, it is up to the prosecutor whether there also is a case filed in state court.

— The VTC will have the power to review cases already adjudicated. To do this, attorneys would make a joint referral recommendation to the criminal court judge conducting the probation hearing and sentencing of the defendant; or to the judge reviewing, post-sentence, the performance of probation.”

Advertisements

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: